![]() |
| Photo: http://www.ew.com Season 2 promo shot (2008). Don't they look so young here? Particularly Jenny- her transformation is clearly the most extreme and fascinating out of all of the characters on the show. |
My love for Gossip Girl (the TV show) started a few years ago, but up until last year, I was content with watching the odd episode on airplanes or the re-runs on TV. Last year I purchased all four seasons- which proved to be a good entertainment source. Upon purchasing the third season, I decided that it would probably be good to give the books a try. Reading the reviews of the Gossip Girl series proved that they were raved about, and everyone that read them became obsessed. And to be honest- as rare as it is- I find the TV series to be way better.
![]() |
| Photo: www.fanpop.com The majority of the book series- including the prologue book ("It had to be you") |
Perhaps it's that I was a lover of the TV series before I read the books, or maybe it's because the story line is so different, or maybe it's the fashion, or it could be as simple as the way Leighton Meester acts out Blair Waldorf.
Whatever the reason is, I was not a big fan of the books. The concept for them is great- but the books are really lacking something. The TV show has managed to enhance the characters and the plot line, making it far more interesting. The TV show features a number of cliffhangers that keep the series fresh- as well as adding in the element of fashion. The fashion in Gossip Girl plays a massive role- the plot is about rich young adults on New York's Upper East Side, what do you expect? Despite not exactly being a "fashionista" myself, I still find myself drooling over Serena's extravagant ballgowns or Lily's gorgeous handbags. I find myself wishing I could pull off Blair's outfits with the amount of elegance and grace that Leighton Meester possesses. (Being able to afford the outfits would be a plus, too.)
Another negative to this books were that they were, above all, quite inappropriate- in terms of language and other behaviour the characters take on. The overuse of crude language distracts the reader and undermines the elegance of the Upper East Side that the TV series captures so well. Of course, as both the TV show and books make clear, the Upper East Side isn't as pleasant as it seems- but really, does everyone have to smoke? And drink? These qualities have obviously been altered for TV, so that they can capture their target audience- which I honestly think is for the best. I don't find it too fitting that Serena van der Woodsen has the same mouth as a truck driver- or that Dan Humphrey, the seemingly good boy, is a smoking addict. Obviously, when the characters changed, the plot had to follow- which is possibly the main reason why the TV series and books have very little overlap in story line.
When the TV series first came out, Gossip Girl book lovers were said to be extremely disappointed. Especially the hardcore fans, which I can imagine would have been reading these books cover-to-cover for six years, thriving on when the next book would come out,the excitement for the TV series almost driving them mad. (If your wondering how I can predict all this, it's because I've been in the same position- with another book series. But I'll save that for another post.) So obviously, the amount of disappointment from the TV series premiere would have followed, leaving them heart-broken-at the very least.
So it's a matter of opinion. I personally believe that the TV series trumps the books- which, I must stress, is a very rare occurrence. What do you think?
![]() |
| Photo: www.alexwoo.com Blair in the episode "The Townie"- Season 4. Isn't she gorgeous? |
Whatever the reason is, I was not a big fan of the books. The concept for them is great- but the books are really lacking something. The TV show has managed to enhance the characters and the plot line, making it far more interesting. The TV show features a number of cliffhangers that keep the series fresh- as well as adding in the element of fashion. The fashion in Gossip Girl plays a massive role- the plot is about rich young adults on New York's Upper East Side, what do you expect? Despite not exactly being a "fashionista" myself, I still find myself drooling over Serena's extravagant ballgowns or Lily's gorgeous handbags. I find myself wishing I could pull off Blair's outfits with the amount of elegance and grace that Leighton Meester possesses. (Being able to afford the outfits would be a plus, too.)
Another negative to this books were that they were, above all, quite inappropriate- in terms of language and other behaviour the characters take on. The overuse of crude language distracts the reader and undermines the elegance of the Upper East Side that the TV series captures so well. Of course, as both the TV show and books make clear, the Upper East Side isn't as pleasant as it seems- but really, does everyone have to smoke? And drink? These qualities have obviously been altered for TV, so that they can capture their target audience- which I honestly think is for the best. I don't find it too fitting that Serena van der Woodsen has the same mouth as a truck driver- or that Dan Humphrey, the seemingly good boy, is a smoking addict. Obviously, when the characters changed, the plot had to follow- which is possibly the main reason why the TV series and books have very little overlap in story line.
When the TV series first came out, Gossip Girl book lovers were said to be extremely disappointed. Especially the hardcore fans, which I can imagine would have been reading these books cover-to-cover for six years, thriving on when the next book would come out,the excitement for the TV series almost driving them mad. (If your wondering how I can predict all this, it's because I've been in the same position- with another book series. But I'll save that for another post.) So obviously, the amount of disappointment from the TV series premiere would have followed, leaving them heart-broken-at the very least.
![]() |
| Photo: www.ew.com How adorable. |
So it's a matter of opinion. I personally believe that the TV series trumps the books- which, I must stress, is a very rare occurrence. What do you think?





